It's Illegal to X-Ray Your Feet at a Shoe Store in Nevada
Nevada still bans the shoe-store X-ray machines of the 1950s — and nearly every listicle that mentions this law cites the wrong statute. The real section is NRS 202.245; 202.248 is about something else entirely.
From the 1920s through the 1950s, walking into a shoe store often meant stepping onto a fluoroscope — a cabinet-sized X-ray machine that let you watch your own foot bones wiggle inside a new pair of oxfords. It was pure marketing theater, and it delivered real radiation doses, often to children who begged to look at their glowing skeletons again and again. As the dangers of radiation became understood, states began banning the machines, with most acting between 1957 and 1970.
Nevada's turn came in 1960, and the statute could not be plainer: "A person shall not operate or maintain any shoe-fitting device or shoe-fitting machine which uses fluoroscopic, X-ray or radiation principles." Violation is a misdemeanor. The Legislature touched the section again in 1985 but never repealed it, so the ban remains live law in 2026 — protecting Nevadans from a machine nobody has seen in a store for generations.
Here's the fact-check bonus: the weird-laws listicles that repeat this one almost universally cite it as NRS 202.248. That's wrong. NRS 202.248 is Nevada's liquid-silicone-injection felony. The shoe-fluoroscope ban is NRS 202.245 — one section over. The internet copied one bad citation for years without anyone opening the actual statute book. We did.
Current Penalty
Misdemeanor — up to 6 months in jail and a $1,000 fine. No modern prosecutions exist because the machines vanished decades ago.
Has Anyone Actually Been Cited?
No modern prosecutions found. The machines disappeared decades ago, leaving the statute a live but purely theoretical crime.
The Attorney's Take
Thomas Boley, Las Vegas Criminal Defense Attorney
“This entry is really about citations. Every listicle repeating this law points to NRS 202.248 — the wrong section. One digit off, completely different crime. In my practice, the exact statute and subsection you're charged under controls everything: the penalty range, the defenses, whether a record can be sealed. If the internet can't get a shoe-store X-ray law right, don't let it be your source on anything that actually matters.”
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
Verified against the primary source: 2026-07-02